|
|
-
- 3185GT 62 ***
35th ***
- 250 GT SWB
California Spyder, LHD
- Covered headlights (covered with net, not glas),
steel, hardtop
- Chassis Tipo 539/61
- Engine Tipo 168/61
- Gearbox Tipo 539/61
| Date |
Result |
Event |
Driver |
# |
Reference |
| 62
- .............., I |
|
| 6.
- imported to the States by Roma Automobili of Beverly
Hills, CA, USA |
|
| -
painted medium grey-blue met./red; the front was
crunched with damage to the bodywork, grille and
headlight covers (cracked) |
|
| 69
- Peter Helm, Studio City, CA, USA (actor) |
|
| 76
- John Hadjuk, Motorkraft shop, Bensenville, Illinois,
USA |
"365
DZS (CA) " |
| 76
- Roger S. Meiners, Detroit, MI, USA |
|
|
"I
purchased this car in 1976 from John Hadjuk. It
was silver with a silver hardtop. It had the
wire mesh headlight covers that were in the photo
published in *The Spyder California, A Ferrari of
Particular Distinction* by George M. Carrick (Page
69). The car was previously owned by Peter Helm
in the state of California (I have the old
registration slips). The wire mesh headlight
covers were added, I believe, after the car's front
end was damaged. I inspected the nose of the car
and found thick Bondo covering dented and torn metal. I
then had Hadjuk rebuild the engine and transmission
and detail the engine compartment, also installed a
complete rear axle from a 250 PF Coupe because the
California's axle needed to be rebuilt. The 250
PF had overdrive, so the rear axle ratio was too low
for highway driving. I sold both axles with the
car to Mulacek. Dr. Ron Mulacek replaced the nose of
the car when he restored it." Roger Meiners
|
|
| 79 - Dr. Ron
Mulacek, La Grange, IL, USA - re-painted red |
|
| 79 - FCA
Ladies Choice |
|
| ..
- Jarold Evans, Portola Valley, CA, USA |
|
| 81
- Reinhard Otto Elich, D |
|
| 86 -
anonymous, D |
|
| 86/jun/06-08 |
|
FOC
Treffen, Internationales Oldtimer Festival,
Nuerburgring |
anonymous |
|
Auto
Welt 2/86 p190 "OHA-XX 12" |
| 88/aug/11-14 |
|
Oldtimer
GP Nuerburgring |
anonymous |
|
|
| 91/aug/08-11 |
|
Oldtimer
GP Nuerburgring |
anonymous |
|
C66
p33 |
| 94/aug/24 |
|
International
Ferrari Concours, Monterey, class 8 |
anonymous |
|
C84
p28 |
| 97/may/31 |
|
50
anni Ferrari |
anonymous |
|
|
| 06/sep/01-03 |
|
Ferrari
Racing Days, Nuerburgring |
anonymous |
|
|
| 07/may/22-24 |
|
60
anni Ferrari |
anonymous |
|
"GÖ-X2
H" Via Abetone 02/07 p47 |
|
Note: Owner's
name removed on his request
Some
Ferrari owners don't want - for whichever reasons
anyone to know that they own one or several of these
wonderful cars.
But
in the same hand, these owners participate in events
like the Ferrari meeting during the AvD Oldtimer Grand
Prix or in Ferrari's 50th Anniversary Celebration in
Rome and Maranello; these events are/were at least
partly accessible to the public.
If
someone takes a photo of the car with its registration
plate in a public event, the owner does not have the
legal right to prohibit the photographer from
publishing this photo.
If
the name of the owner is either listed in a publicly
available entry list or later on published in a
publicly available magazine (like "auto welt",
published in the 1980s and 1990s by Auto Becker), the
owner has no legal right to prohibit the photographer
from adding this information with source reference to
the photo.
Many
owners don't really know about the legal conditions
regarding these matters. Out of this ignorance, they
threaten publishers and event organizers either with
"legal actions" (which would be pointless)
or by announcing that they would never again
participate in an event like the one during which they
were spotted.
www.barchetta.cc
do know about the legal conditions VERY well. However,
it is not our intention to cause harm to publishers or
event organizers (like Ferrari Italia or Ferrari
Deutschland GmbH) or any other third party who might
be threatened by ignorant owners and customers. We do
want that as many cars as possible will be publicly
shown in future events.
For
this reason, www.barchetta.cc willingly and obligingly
removed the names of certain owners from our website.
It just should be pointed out that the characters in
question did NOT have any legal right to ask for the
removal of particular information since the latter
were collected in an accurate and totally legal way.
The editors
|
|
-
|
|